In 1985, a lone soldier dropped into enemy territory and began running north.
There was little time for explanation. Soldiers rushed from the sides of the battlefield, riflemen fired from behind fortifications, grenades exploded across the ground, and vehicles appeared with little warning. The player could shoot, throw a limited supply of grenades, dodge, and continue pressing toward the top of the screen. Retreat might buy a few seconds, but the game itself was built around movement forward.
Capcom called the game Senjō no Ōkami in Japan, a title commonly translated as Wolf of the Battlefield. When the game traveled overseas, it became Commando, and the simpler title helped introduce one of Capcom’s most important early arcade games to an international audience. The Japanese release arrived in 1985, followed by a North American version distributed by Data East USA, which arcade records date to July of that year.
What followed was larger than a successful arcade cabinet. Commando became a major home-computer license, helped make Elite Systems a significant name in British software, produced one of the Commodore 64’s best remembered soundtracks, received an expanded Nintendo Entertainment System conversion, and helped establish a style of military action game that competitors would spend years developing further.
From Senjō no Ōkami to Commando
Capcom was still a comparatively young name in video games when Senjō no Ōkami appeared. The company had already produced titles such as Vulgus and 1942, but many of the franchises that would eventually make Capcom one of the industry’s most recognizable publishers had not yet appeared.
One of the people at the center of this early period was Tokuro Fujiwara.
Fujiwara’s importance to Capcom would eventually stretch across projects connected with Ghosts ‘n Goblins, Bionic Commando, Mega Man, and the development environment that produced Resident Evil. In 1985, however, he was still helping establish the design identity of Capcom’s arcade business.
Commando became one of the games with which he was personally associated. In a 1985 BEEP! questionnaire that asked Japanese developers which of their creations gave them special pride, Fujiwara answered simply: Commando. The comment is especially valuable because it was made during the game’s own year of release rather than decades later, when its reputation had already been established.
Years afterward, Fujiwara explained that Commando and Ghosts ‘n Goblins were being developed at roughly the same time. Rather than finding the radically different projects confusing, he remembered the contrast as creatively useful because ideas generated while working on one game could help stimulate thoughts for the other. Both became successes and together demonstrated how quickly Capcom’s development operation was maturing during 1985.
The result with Commando was a game built around an uncomplicated premise executed with unusual intensity.
One Soldier Against an Army
The central idea required almost no instruction. The player controlled a soldier from a slightly elevated overhead perspective while the battlefield scrolled vertically. An eight-direction joystick allowed movement around incoming soldiers and gunfire, while separate buttons controlled the player’s firearm and grenades.
The gun provided the reliable weapon. Grenades were more precious. They could be used against fortified positions and enemies that were difficult to reach with direct fire, which meant that even in a game remembered for frantic action there was a small layer of resource management beneath the shooting.
As the player advanced, the battlefield itself created pressure. Enemy soldiers did not simply wait at the top of the screen. They appeared from multiple directions, occupied defensive positions, emerged near the player, and forced constant adjustments in movement. Bridges, bunkers, trenches, vehicles, fortifications, water, and other obstacles broke the march into a succession of small combat problems.
The later Elite Systems home-computer instructions gave the protagonist a name, Super Joe, describing him as a combat soldier armed with an M60 machine gun and six grenades. The manual emphasized exactly what made the design effective. The player was expected to continue forcing a path into hostile territory while enemy troops emerged from strongholds and troop carriers and obstacles narrowed the route toward the fortress.
That forward momentum separated Commando from many earlier shooters. It retained the constant threat and scoring mentality of the arcade shoot ’em up, but placed a human figure on the battlefield and gave the player much greater freedom to maneuver around the screen.
The formula was simple enough to understand immediately and difficult enough to demand repeated play.
A Battlefield Built for the Arcade
The arcade structure of Commando also suited the economics of the coin-operated game.
Players could rarely remain stationary for long. Enemies continued arriving, the safest route could disappear quickly, and progress toward the next defensive position created another confrontation. The design encouraged fast decisions, repeated deaths, memorization, and another coin.
Contemporary reviewers noticed its speed.
British writers were discussing Commando within months of its release. Mike Roberts covered the game in Computer Gamer during the summer of 1985, while Computer and Video Games devoted attention to the arcade machine in its August issue. These were not retrospective writers rediscovering an obscure cabinet. They were observing a current arcade attraction while it was establishing its reputation. The contemporary reaction emphasized the game’s animation, movement, action, and the pressure created by enemies attacking from across the battlefield.
American trade reporting told a similar story from the business side.
When Data East USA prepared the game for the North American market, Cash Box presented Commando as the company’s next major release following Karate Champ and Kung-Fu Master. Its November 1985 trade coverage described a mission behind enemy lines in which attackers emerged from bunkers, crossed bridges, arrived in vehicles, and approached from multiple directions. The important point was not simply that Commando existed. Data East was selling operators on constant action and replayable pressure, exactly the qualities that could keep a cabinet earning money.
The game’s Japanese performance was also being tracked almost immediately. Game Machine, one of the most important Japanese amusement-industry publications, included Senjō no Ōkami in its 1985 “Best Hit Games” coverage, providing contemporary evidence for the game’s position inside the Japanese arcade market rather than relying only on its later reputation.
By the end of the year, RePlay was including Commando in American operator and player surveys. What had begun as a Capcom arcade release in Japan had become part of the international coin-operated business within a matter of months.
Capcom Crosses the Pacific
The North American story also reflects how differently Capcom operated during its early years.
Rather than releasing the American arcade cabinet entirely through the structure later associated with Capcom USA, the North American Commando was handled by Data East USA under license. Arcade records distinguish this version from the Japanese Senjō no Ōkami and date the American release to July 1985.
That arrangement places Commando at an interesting transitional point.
Capcom had created a game strong enough to travel internationally, but the global publishing system surrounding the company was still developing. In the years that followed, Capcom would become instantly recognizable to American console players through its own branding, particularly on the Nintendo Entertainment System. In 1985, however, an American arcade player could encounter one of Capcom’s major games through a cabinet promoted by Data East.
The game itself required little cultural translation. Its enemy army was deliberately generalized. Jungle terrain, military vehicles, uniforms, fortresses, prisoners, and commandos supplied the imagery without tying the action firmly to one real war.
That vagueness also made Commando unusually compatible with the action culture of the 1980s.
The Action Hero Arrives in Video Games
The name inevitably invites comparison with the Arnold Schwarzenegger film Commando, also released in 1985, but Capcom’s game was not an adaptation of the movie.
Instead, both belonged to a much larger fascination with the solitary military hero.
American popular culture during the middle of the decade was filled with stories about elite soldiers who entered hostile territory with limited support and defeated forces that should have overwhelmed them. Missing in Action appeared in 1984. Rambo: First Blood Part II followed in 1985. Schwarzenegger’s Commando arrived that same year. Similar imagery spread through films, television, toys, and eventually video games.
Capcom’s game fit naturally into that environment even though it originated in Japan.
The historical meaning of the game was therefore not confined to a single conflict. The battlefield could evoke World War II jungle fighting, Vietnam, Cold War proxy conflicts, or simply the fictional military worlds of contemporary action movies. A study from California State University, Long Beach’s Center for the History of Video Games and Critical Play has similarly noted how the game’s deliberately vague setting allowed American players to bring the military anxieties and action mythology of the 1980s into their interpretation of Super Joe’s mission.
What mattered most was the fantasy of control. One soldier could enter the battlefield, rescue prisoners, destroy enemy forces, penetrate the fortress, and win.
Elite Brings Commando Home
The arcade cabinet was only the beginning.
In Britain, Elite Systems acquired the rights to produce home-computer conversions of Commando. This placed one of 1985’s hottest arcade properties into a computer market where players increasingly expected major coin-operated games to appear on machines such as the ZX Spectrum, Commodore 64, BBC Micro, and Amstrad CPC.
Elite’s own instructions openly advertised the goal. The company described its version as developed with Capcom’s assistance in an effort to create the closest possible home-computer simulation of the arcade hit.
That was an ambitious promise.
Home computers could not simply reproduce an arcade board. Programmers had to rebuild the experience around less powerful processors, different graphics systems, smaller memory budgets, keyboard or joystick controls, and hardware that varied dramatically from one machine to another.
The Spectrum conversion, for example, is credited by the Centre for Computing History to Keith Burkhill, Nigel Alderton, Rory C. Green, and Karen Trueman. Despite the limitations of the hardware, the museum notes how closely the conversion followed the arcade structure, with vertical movement, shooting, grenade attacks, prisoner rescues, defensive positions, and large confrontations at the ends of areas.
Period advertising pushed the connection relentlessly. Elite marketed Commando as an arcade number one, turning the prestige of the cabinet into a reason for computer owners to buy the conversion.
The strategy worked.
The Battle Over Who Dares Wins
The value of the license became obvious even before Elite’s version had fully reached the market.
Another British publisher, Alligata, prepared a game called Who Dares Wins. Contemporary observers immediately noticed its resemblance to Commando. The similarities mattered because Elite had paid for the official home-computer rights and did not want a competing title offering players what appeared to be a substitute before its licensed conversion was ready.
The dispute escalated into legal action.
Computer Gamer covered the controversy in 1985, and later accounts based on interviews with Elite personnel describe the company moving to stop distribution of the original Who Dares Wins. Alligata subsequently altered the game, changing points that had been identified as too similar, and released the revised product as Who Dares Wins II.
The episode is an important part of Commando’s history because it demonstrates how valuable arcade licenses had become.
A successful arcade game was no longer merely earning coins in cabinets. Its mechanics, name, reputation, and visual identity could support a second commercial life across the home-computer industry. Publishers were willing to spend money obtaining those rights and, when necessary, defend them.
Eight Weeks to Build a Hit
The Commodore 64 conversion became one of the most interesting versions of all.
Programmer Chris Butler later remembered being given an extremely short development schedule. In a contemporary interview preserved from Zzap!64, Butler said that the conversion took roughly eight weeks and described it as a rush job aimed at reaching the Christmas market.
The time pressure forced compromises. Memory became particularly valuable once music was added, and material had to be cut to make everything fit. Butler was openly critical of parts of his own work, remembering bugs and acknowledging that he had far less time than he wanted.
Then he added the detail that mattered commercially.
It made Christmas number one.
That contrast captures much of the British computer industry during the period. Games could be developed under extreme time pressure by tiny teams, contain obvious compromises, and still become enormous successes if they captured the excitement of a famous arcade machine at the right moment.
In Commando’s case, one additional piece of the C64 conversion would become nearly as famous as the game itself.
Rob Hubbard and the Sound of Commando
Rob Hubbard’s music for the Commodore 64 version became one of the defining pieces of 8-bit game music.
The story of its creation is almost as frantic as the game.
Hubbard later recalled traveling to Elite’s offices, listening briefly to the arcade machine and then working through the night on the Commodore 64 soundtrack. Rather than simply reproducing the arcade music note for note, he used part of its musical identity as a starting point and built something suited to the C64’s SID sound chip. By the time the office staff returned the following morning, Hubbard remembered having the music running on the computers around the building.
The result gave the conversion a personality separate from the cabinet.
Arcade Commando had already used music to reinforce its constant forward movement. Hubbard transformed that idea into a much more elaborate C64 arrangement, using the machine’s limited sound channels with enough rhythmic density that the soundtrack seemed larger than the hardware should have allowed.
For many computer owners, this became the version of Commando they remembered.
It also demonstrates something important about arcade conversions. A technically weaker machine did not necessarily create a culturally weaker version. Sometimes the limitations encouraged programmers, artists, and musicians to produce interpretations with qualities that the original did not possess.
The C64 Commando was not the arcade board squeezed into a home computer. It was its own piece of 1985 computer-game history.
Commando Conquers the Home Market
The home versions turned the arcade success into a mass-market software property.
British sales charts kept Commando near the top during the 1985 Christmas season and into 1986. Contemporary magazines reviewed it across multiple machines, while Elite’s advertisements repeatedly emphasized its arcade pedigree. Surviving Gallup charts show that the game continued appearing among Britain’s leading sellers after the initial holiday rush.
Awards followed the commercial success.
Computer Gamer selected the arcade version as its best coin-operated machine in its Game of the Year awards. The home release later won the arcade-style category at the Golden Joystick Awards, while readers of Crash recognized it among the year’s leading shoot ’em ups.
The importance of those honors is not that every publication agreed on the game’s quality. Contemporary reviews could criticize graphics, missing material, difficulty, or compromises in individual conversions. The significance is that Commando had become visible enough to appear repeatedly in sales charts, reader polls, industry coverage, advertisements, and awards.
It had escaped the arcade.
Super Joe Comes to Nintendo
Capcom eventually brought Commando directly into one of the most important new markets in gaming.
The Nintendo Entertainment System version reached North America in 1986 and placed Commando inside Capcom’s growing console catalog. The manual identified the cartridge as NES-CO-USA and promoted it as part of the company’s “Captain Commando Challenge Series,” an early example of Capcom trying to create a recognizable identity across its Nintendo releases.
The NES version retained the central structure but expanded the experience.
Players again controlled Super Joe with eight-direction movement, a firearm, and grenades, but the console game added hidden shelters, bonus items, prisoners, additional enemies, and secrets that rewarded exploration beyond simply surviving the upward march. Capcom’s instructions described hidden ladders and underground areas where hostages could be found, while Nintendo’s own official player’s guide mapped the stages and explained the expanded enemy roster.
That approach would become increasingly common in the 1980s. An arcade game’s home version did not have to be a perfect copy. It could become an adaptation designed around the expectations of console players who were no longer paying for each attempt and therefore wanted more secrets, more stages, and more reasons to keep a cartridge in the machine.
The Games That Followed Commando
Success attracted imitation almost immediately.
Vertical battlefield shooters and run-and-gun games multiplied during the second half of the decade. SNK’s Ikari Warriors became one of the most famous, adding rotary controls and two-player simultaneous action to a formula that clearly occupied the same broad territory.
Fujiwara himself later discussed Ikari Warriors when reflecting on the era. He accepted copying and rapid imitation as part of the industry but expressed disappointment that competitors were able to build multiple sequels around similar ideas while Commando did not immediately receive the same treatment.
Capcom eventually returned to the concept.
Mercs, released in 1990 and known in Japan as Senjō no Ōkami II, expanded the battlefield formula with heavier weapons, more elaborate graphics, vehicles, and cooperative action. Much later, Wolf of the Battlefield: Commando 3 revived the name again.
The wider influence was even larger than the official series.
The idea of moving an armed character freely through a scrolling battlefield became one of the standard languages of action games. Ikari Warriors, Guerrilla War, Heavy Barrel, and many other titles developed variations involving soldiers, commandos, rescue missions, grenades, vehicles, fortifications, and armies attacking from multiple directions.
Commando did not invent every one of those elements, but it brought them together in a form that was immediately understandable and commercially powerful.
Why Commando Still Matters
Seen today, the original Commando can appear almost impossibly simple.
Move north. Shoot soldiers. Throw grenades. Survive.
Yet that simplicity hides why the game mattered.
Capcom created an action system that could communicate its rules almost instantly. The perspective gave players freedom of movement without sacrificing the relentless progression of a scrolling shooter. The military setting provided an immediate visual language. The enemy patterns created enough pressure to reward practice. The scoring system encouraged another attempt. The home conversions proved that the concept could survive dramatic differences in hardware.
Its history also captures an industry in transition.
The Japanese original shows Capcom emerging as an important arcade developer. The Data East release demonstrates the licensing partnerships through which Japanese games traveled into American arcades. Elite’s conversions reveal the enormous British market for licensed arcade software. The Who Dares Wins dispute shows how commercially valuable gameplay and licensing had become. Chris Butler’s rushed conversion illustrates the brutal production schedules of 1980s computer development. Rob Hubbard’s soundtrack demonstrates how home versions could create their own cultural legacy. The NES cartridge points toward the console business that would soon become central to Capcom’s identity.
Most importantly, the people who created the game understood that they had produced something special almost immediately.
When Tokuro Fujiwara was asked in 1985 which of his games gave him particular pride, he did not need decades of hindsight.
He chose Commando.
Four decades later, the answer makes sense. Before Mega Man ran through Dr. Wily’s stages, before Street Fighter transformed competitive fighting games, and before Resident Evil opened the doors of the Spencer Mansion, Capcom had already discovered the power of dropping one determined hero into impossible odds and telling the player to keep moving forward.
Sources & Further Reading
Capcom. Commando. U.S. Arcade Sales Flyer. 1985. International Arcade Museum. https://flyers.arcade-museum.com/videogames/show/1516
Capcom. Commando. European Arcade Sales Flyer. 1985. International Arcade Museum. https://flyers.arcade-museum.com/videogames/show/206
Capcom. Senjō no Ōkami. Japanese Arcade Sales Flyer. 1985. International Arcade Museum. https://flyers.arcade-museum.com/videogames/show/1822
Capcom and Data East USA. Commando Instruction Manual. 1985. International Arcade Museum. https://www.arcade-museum.com/Videogame/commando
Capcom and Data East USA. Commando Instruction Manual. No. 780-0019-00. 1985. ArcadeRTFM. https://arcadertfm.com/m/commando
Capcom. Commando Game Pak Instructions. Nintendo Entertainment System. 1986. The Game Is Afoot Arcade. https://www.thegameisafootarcade.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Commando-Game-Manual-1.pdf
Capcom. Commando Game Pak Instructions. Nintendo Entertainment System. 1986. World of Nintendo. https://www.world-of-nintendo.com/manuals/nes/commando.shtml
Capcom Co., Ltd. “History.” Corporate Information. Accessed October 11, 2026. https://www.capcom.co.jp/ir/english/company/history.html
Capcom Co., Ltd. “Game Series Sales: Commando.” Product Data. Accessed October 11, 2026. https://www.capcom.co.jp/ir/english/business/salesdata.html
Compasio, Camille. “Around the Route.” Cash Box, June 8, 1985, 43–44. https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Cash-Box/80s/1985/CB-1985-06-08.pdf
“Game Machine’s Best Hit Games 25.” Game Machine, no. 261, June 1, 1985, 23. https://onitama.tv/gamemachine/pdf/19850601p.pdf
“Overseas Readers Column.” Game Machine, no. 263, July 1, 1985, 26. https://onitama.tv/gamemachine/pdf/19850701p.pdf
“Arcade Action: Commando.” Computer and Video Games, no. 46, August 1985, 108. https://archive.org/details/cvg-magazine-046/page/n107
Roberts, Mike. “Coin-Op Connection.” Computer Gamer, no. 4, July 1985, 18–19. https://archive.org/details/Computer_Gamer_Issue_04_1985-07_Argus_Press_GB/page/n17/mode/2up
“War-Time Action.” Cash Box, November 2, 1985, 50. https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Cash-Box/80s/1985/CB-1985-11-02.pdf
“RePlay: The Players’ Choice.” RePlay 11, no. 2, November 1985, 6. https://archive.org/details/re-play-volume-11-issue-no.-2-november-1985-600DPI
“1985 Operator Survey: This Poll Says Go Gettum!” RePlay 11, no. 2, November 1985, 91–102. https://archive.org/details/re-play-volume-11-issue-no.-2-november-1985-600DPI/page/93
“Data East: Dedicated Videos Make Dollars & Sense for Operators.” RePlay 11, no. 2, November 1985, 108, 110–11. https://archive.org/details/re-play-volume-11-issue-no.-2-november-1985-600DPI
“Who Dares Wins.” Computer Gamer, no. 7, October 1985. https://archive.org/details/Computer_Gamer_Issue_07_1985-10_Argus_Press_GB/page/n60/mode/1up
Elite Systems. “Commando: The Smash Hit No. 1 Arcade Game!” Advertisement. Popular Computing Weekly 4, no. 44, October 31–November 6, 1985. https://www.computinghistory.org.uk/det/28815/Popular-Computing-Weekly-Vol-4-No-44-31-October-6-November-1985/
Elite Systems. “Commando.” Advertisement. Popular Computing Weekly, November 28–December 4, 1985, 56. https://www.computinghistory.org.uk/det/28138/Popular-Computing-Weekly-Vol-4-No-48-28-November-4-December-1985/
Elite Systems. “Commando.” Advertisement. Popular Computing Weekly, December 5–11, 1985, 2. https://www.computinghistory.org.uk/det/28817/Popular-Computing-Weekly-Vol-4-No-49-5-11-December-1985/
“The Smash Hit No. 1 Arcade Game! Commando.” Advertisement. Computer and Video Games, no. 51, January 1986, 2–3. https://archive.org/details/computer-video-games-magazine-051/page/n1/mode/2up
“Software Reviews: Commando.” Computer and Video Games, no. 51, January 1986, 17. https://archive.org/details/computer-video-games-magazine-051
“Commando vs. Rambo.” Computer and Video Games, no. 52, February 1986, 15. https://archive.org/details/computer-video-games-magazine-052
“Commando: Soldier of Fortune.” Your Sinclair, no. 1, January 1986, 54. https://archive.org/details/your-sinclair-01/page/n53
“Commando.” Crash, no. 24, January 1986, 130–31. https://www.zx-spectrum.cz/zxsr/zxsr.php?id=9325
“Commando.” Sinclair User, no. 46, January 1986. https://sinclairuser.com/046/sftwrea.htm
Segre, Nicole. “Commando.” Sinclair User, no. 47, February 1986. https://sinclairuser.com/047/index.htm
“Commando.” Zzap!64, no. 10, February 1986, 26. https://codetapper.com/c64/zzap-reviews/commando-zzap-review/
“Reviews: Commando.” Computer Gamer, no. 10, January 1986. https://archive.org/details/Computer_Gamer_Issue_10_1986-01_Argus_Press_GB
“Games Review.” New Straits Times, January 10, 1986, 12. https://books.google.com/books?id=JgROAAAAIBAJ&article_id=5059,2326397
“Commando.” Amstrad Computer User, no. 19, June 1986.
“Game of the Year Awards: Best Coin-Op Machine.” Computer Gamer, no. 11, February 1986, 13–15. https://archive.org/details/Computer_Gamer_Issue_11_1986-02_Argus_Press_GB/page/n12
“Golden Joystick Awards.” Computer and Video Games, no. 55, May 1986, 90. https://archive.org/details/computer-video-games-magazine-055
“The Software Chart.” Computer and Video Games, no. 52, February 1986, 64. https://archive.org/details/computer-video-games-magazine-052/page/n63/mode/1up
Gallup. “All Formats Chart.” Computer and Video Games, February 1986. ComputerHits.org. https://computerhits.org/archive/computer%20%26%20video%20games_1986-02-16_all%20formats/
Gallup. “All Formats Chart.” Popular Computing Weekly, March 20, 1986, 43. ComputerHits.org. https://computerhits.org/archive/popular%20computing%20weekly_1986-03-20_all%20formats/
Elite Systems. Commando: ZX Spectrum Instructions. 1985. Games Database. https://www.gamesdatabase.org/Media/SYSTEM/Sinclair_ZX_Spectrum/Manual/formated/Commando_-1985-_Elite_Systems_Ltd..htm
Elite Systems. Commando. ZX Spectrum cassette inlay, instructions, advertisements, and software. World of Spectrum. https://worldofspectrum.org/archive/software/games/commando-elite-systems-ltd
Data East and Elite Systems. Commando: Commodore 64 Instructions. Lemon64. https://www.lemon64.com/doc/commando/148
Nintendo of America. Official Nintendo Player’s Guide. Redmond, WA: Nintendo of America, 1987, 24–27. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL9208693M/Official_Nintendo_Player%27s_Guide
Atari Corporation. Commando: Atari 7800 Game Manual. AtariAge. https://www.atariage.com/manual_html_page.php?SoftwareLabelID=725
“ゲームで見るカプコンの歴史” [Capcom History Through Games]. Gamest, no. 7, April 1987. https://archive.org/details/gamest0007/page/n17/mode/1up
BEEP! “59 Developers, 20 Questions.” October 1985. Tokuro Fujiwara interview. Translated by Shmuplations. https://shmuplations.com/20questions1985/
Fujiwara, Tokuro. Interview. CONTINUE 12, October 2003. English translation by GlitterBerri. https://glitterberri.com/developer-interviews/tokuro-fujiwara/
Alfa Records and Capcom. Capcom Game Music. Liner notes. 1986.
Meades, Alan. Arcade Britannia: A Social History of the British Amusement Arcade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2022, 184. https://books.google.com/books?id=LudaEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA184
Fox, Matt. The Video Games Guide: 1,000+ Arcade, Console and Computer Games, 1962–2012. 2nd ed. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2013, 57–58. https://books.google.com/books?id=xzMYYrsDaAEC&pg=PA57
International Arcade Museum. “Commando.” Killer List of Videogames. Accessed October 11, 2026. https://www.arcade-museum.com/Videogame/commando
Arcade-History. “Senjou no Ookami.” Accessed October 11, 2026. https://www.arcade-history.com/game/2391/senjou-no-ookami
Arcade-History. “Commando.” Accessed October 11, 2026. https://www.arcade-history.com/game/490/commando
Centre for Computing History. “Commando.” Accessed October 11, 2026. https://www.computinghistory.org.uk/det/3780/Commando/
System 16. “Capcom Commando Hardware.” Accessed October 11, 2026. https://system16.com/hardware.php?gid=46&id=788
MobyGames. “Commando.” Accessed October 11, 2026. https://www.mobygames.com/game/1618/commando/
World of Spectrum. “Commando.” Accessed October 11, 2026. https://worldofspectrum.net/item/0009325/
California State University, Long Beach, Center for the History of Video Games and Critical Play. “Talking NES and History: Capcom Commando 1986.” June 26, 2020. https://www.criticalplay.org/quick-thoughts/2020/6/26/talking-nes-and-history-capcom-commando-1986
Mason, Graeme. “Ultimate Guide: Commando.” Retro Gamer, no. 138, February 2015.
Carroll, Martyn. “Are You Elite?” Retro Gamer, no. 13, May 2005.
Wiltshire, Alex. Britsoft: An Oral History. London: Read-Only Memory, 2015.
NesCartDB. “Commando.” Accessed October 11, 2026. https://nescartdb.com/profile/view/478/commando